I'm saying that Drew rewrote the characters. And yeah, I know that's kind of a plot hole in of itself.īut does this really mean that all of KOTOR II simply didn't happen? I mean, despite his changing of their backgrounds and whatnot, it didn't seem like he was trying to insinuate that the events of KOTOR II didn't occur.
Well, she was fine in the trial with the Council, which took place close enough to the event that she couldn't tell whether the Council had severed her or whether she severed herself on Malachor V. So despite having already experienced it before, why would that suddenly make her immune to the effects of being cut off from it again? Especially because being without the Force is like the very worst thing a Jedi/Force user can go through. Which is completely wrong.īut does this really mean that all of KOTOR II simply didn't happen? I mean, despite his changing of their backgrounds and whatnot, it didn't seem like he was trying to insinuate that the events of KOTOR II didn't we know how she was initially coping when she first cut herself off from the Force? Because by this point in the novel, she was basically entirely reconnected to the Force, correct? Which means if she suddenly lost the ability to feel it again, it would likely be pretty overwhelming even though she'd experienced it before. Kreia and the Triumvirate (thus including Nihilus) were also rewritten as some mere post-JCW rogue Jedi who turned to teachings uncovered by Revan and Malak. lolĭo we know how she was initially coping when she first cut herself off from the Force? Because by this point in the novel, she was basically entirely reconnected to the Force, correct? Which means if she suddenly lost the ability to feel it again, it would likely be pretty overwhelming even though she'd experienced it before. Surik lives for a decade without the Force - yet she feels like she's going to be torn apart on Nathema because she can't feel the Force. The characters in the novel have contradictory experiences - even to Drew's own descriptions.